6 Reasons Why the "The Hobbit" Isn't As Good as Any of the Lord of the Rings Movies

(Spoilers spoilers spoilers below. You have been warned. Do not read on if you want to watch the new movie without knowing some elements that happen.) Just saw THE HOBBIT. Was kinda disappointed. It's not good when a 9-minute preview (Star Trek Into Darkness) outshines a 2.5-hour movie. But alas, I felt that to be the case. You know how sometimes when you walk out of a theater, you either liked or disliked the movie, but you can't quite put your finger on why you feel how you feel? That happens to me, too, naturally. But with THE HOBBIT, I was immediately able to point out some major flaws that made the plot & story, which should have been epic, merely OK. Here are 6 things that come to mind without much thought:
Author:
Publish date:

(Spoilers spoilers spoilers below. You have been warned. Do not read on if you want to watch the new movie without knowing some elements that happen)

Just saw THE HOBBIT. Was not impressed. It's not good when a 9-minute preview (Star Trek Into Darkness) outshines a 2.5-hour movie. But alas, I felt that to be the case. You know how sometimes when you walk out of a theater, you either liked or disliked the movie, but you can't quite put your finger on why you feel how you feel? That happens to me, too, naturally. But with THE HOBBIT, I was immediately able to point out some major flaws that made the plot & story, which should have been epic, merely OK. Here are 6 things that come to mind without much thought:

 Credit: New Line Cinema.

Credit: New Line Cinema.

1. Story points and scenes feel stretched.

It feels like too many sequences go on for too long, or take their sweet time. This problem is one you could see coming a mile away. With the Lord of the Rings (LOTR) movies, each Tolkien novel became one film. That's a lot of material to squeeze into a movie. But when you condense a novel, you have an opportunity to cut a lot of fat and just show the juiciest parts. That's likely what LOTR did so well.

Meanwhile, with THE HOBBIT, they've taken just one book and divided it into three whole films. That means they can't cut much out of the book, and that's not a good thing. Heck, during the course of this film, 3 villains are introduced -- the dragon, the "neuromancer," and the pale orc. How many die by the film's end? None. We get closure with none of these villains. At the end of LOTR, at least the tall Uruk Hai, Lurtz, was killed by Aragorn.

2. We know Bilbo and Gandalf will survive.

I believe that part of what makes a movie good is believing the main character is indeed in mortal danger -- that they could die in the end. But here THE HOBBIT is at a disadvantage in that we know that Bilbo and Gandalf survive the events of the film. This is not the filmmakers' faults. But does it affect the moviegoing experience? Yes.

3. No good guys die.

Same thing with this one. We must believe that death is a legitimate possibility. That's what gives a movie tension and stakes. Here we have 15 characters that set out on an insane quest and, by the end of the film, no one dies. One of the best scenes of the first LOTR was when Boromir died at the end. It was touching, and reminded you that this quest has mortal danger. (And don't forget that Gandalf "died," too.) In this film, there is an incredibly long sequence where all the dwarves fight their way out of a goblin lair. They must kill -- I'm not kidding -- about 300-500 goblins -- yet all the dwarves come out on the other side unscathed. Once that happens, you pretty much know no one will bite it by the movie's end.

In THE HOBBIT, we get no deaths. And that is quite a thing considering--

4. We don't care about 11 of the 13 dwarves.

In my opinion, only 2 of the 13 dwarves are developed (and therefore likeable). The rest are forgettable and interchangeable.

Think back to the fellowship of the ring. There were 11 characters, and they were all unique. Even though there were 4 hobbits, you could tell them apart and they each seemed like good characters. Frankly, it just made them more interesting to watch.

5. The stakes aren't as high.

In LOTR, it was a quest to stop the end of the world, basically. In THE HOBBIT (so far), it's merely a quest for dwarves to regain their home (the inside of a mountain). In my opinion, it's simply not as gripping. (I realize the stakes could change in the next 2 films.)

6. We've seen plenty of this before in the LOTR movies, so originality is lost.

  • A hobbit slips while carrying the ring of power and it accidentally falls on his finger? Seen it.
  • The eagles arrive to rescue the good guys when all hope seems lost? Seen it.
  • Gandalf does a spell over a wounded character so they are jarred back to life/consciousness (Pippin in LOTR, Oakenshield here)? Seen it.
  • And so forth.

And if all these problems are attributed to being in the source material (the novel) and the filmmakers' reluctance to change anything at all (such as the number of dwarves), then maybe the movies shouldn't have been made. (That's right. I said it.) Or perhaps they should have made 1-2 films instead of 3.

But it's not ALL bad news regarding THE HOBBIT. We get a lot of returning characters that are nice to see, and the inside of Erebor is beautiful. It was cool to see the orcs speak a language that wasn't English, and the film's score is awesome, as always. So the film has those elements going for them. Plus, the 9 minutes of STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS (select theaters only) were pretty darn awesome. The footage definitely looks like it is setting up another death of Spock. Not sure how I feel about them playing that storyline out again...

I know that it's become very hard to comment on my blog (hurrumph) because all the WD sites have implemented new, aggressive anti-spamming measures (not my call), so if you want to chat about this and cannot comment below, tweet/argue with me at @chucksambuchino. By the way, the trick to commenting is simply to keep trying. If you comment and the page tells you "You're commenting too fast. Please slow down.", then just hit "back" to go back to the blog page where your submitted comment text will reappear. Try submitting it again. Doesn't work? Just hit back and try again. One of the times, it will take. It usually happens on the third try or so for me, and the whole process takes about 30 seconds.

 Credit: Paramount Pictures.

Credit: Paramount Pictures.

Poetic Forms

Rannaigecht Mor Gairit: Poetic Forms

Poetic Form Fridays are made to share various poetic forms. This week, we look at the rannaigecht mor gairit, a variant form of the rannaigecht.

Weinstein_1:21

The Writer, The Inner Critic, & The Slacker

Author and writing professor Alexander Weinstein explains the three parts of a writer's psyche, how they can work against the writer, and how to utilize them for success.

Stottlemyre_1:21

Todd Stottlemyre: On Mixing and Bending Genres

Author Todd Stottlemyre explains how he combined fiction and nonfiction in his latest book and what it meant as a writer to share his personal experiences.

plot_twist_story_prompts_take_a_trip_robert_lee_brewer

Plot Twist Story Prompts: Take a Trip

Every good story needs a nice (or not so nice) turn or two to keep it interesting. This week, have a character take a trip somewhere.

Probst_1:20

Making the Switch from Romance to Women’s Fiction

In this article, author Jennifer Probst explains the differences between romance and women's fiction, the importance of both, and how you can make the genre switch.

Wrobel_1:20

Stephanie Wrobel: On Writing an Unusual Hero

Author Stephanie Wrobel explains how she came to write about mental illness and how it affects familial relationships, as well as getting inside the head of an unusual character.

who_are_the_inaugural_poets_for_united_states_presidents_robert_lee_brewer

Who Are the Inaugural Poets for United States Presidents?

Here is a list of the inaugural poets for United States Presidential Inauguration Days from Robert Frost to Amanda Gorman. This post also touches on who an inaugural poet is and which presidents have had them at their inaugurations.

precedent_vs_president_grammar_rules_robert_lee_brewer

Precedent vs. President (Grammar Rules)

Learn when to use precedent vs. president with Grammar Rules from the Writer's Digest editors, including a few examples of correct usages.

Poetry Prompt

Wednesday Poetry Prompts: 554

Every Wednesday, Robert Lee Brewer shares a prompt and an example poem to get things started on the Poetic Asides blog. This week, write a future poem.