Nick Counter Wins a Screenwriting Oscar (seriously)

Author:
Publish date:

Okay, not seriously. But he deserves one, and I intend to lobby to adapt Oscar nomination rules to include people who haven’t actually written a screenplay. Because no matter who’s nominated for this year’s Best Original Screenplay Oscars, none will have written a second act break as dramatic as the one Nick Counter, the AMPTP’s bombastic head negotiator, handed the Writers Guild Friday afternoon.

After eight days of negotiations, just as it looked like the WGA-AMPTP bartering process might actually be taking hold, Counter ended Day 32 of the writers strike by offering the WGA a crushing take-it-or-leave it proposal/ultimatum, culminating with the statement “that when the WGA sends me a letter confirming that [their] six proposals (I’ll get to them in a minute) are withdrawn, the AMPTP will schedule another negotiation session with the WGA.” In effect, Counter is saying that until the Writers Guild meets six deal-breaking demands, the AMPTP refuses to negotiate further.

I won’t give you a play-by-play of Friday’s events, because Nikki Finke does a bang-up job at Deadline Hollywood Daily, but the AMPTP’s demands are basically a complete revocation of everything writers are requesting, including: payment for original online content, fair residuals for online reuse of movies and TV shows, and guild coverage for reality and animation. And while the WGA is willing to negotiate on most of these points, the AMPTP refuses to even discuss them.

As we all know, the “second act break” is the point in every movie when all is lost for the story’s hero. It’s when E.T. dies. Or Harry and Sally sleep together and things get weird. Or Ben and Alison break up in Knocked Up.

Or the AMPTP walks away from the bargaining table, chucking all their progress and leaving the WGA with nothing but a ridiculously crappy deal.

In other words: all is lost.

But all is not lost. Because this is the moment where our hero—Elliott, Harry, Ben—refuses to give up, regroups, and surges forward to win the day.

So first of all—congrats to Nick Counter (as well as Peter Chernin, Barry Meyer, Les Moonves, and the rest of the AMPTP). You may like to spit on the writers, but at least you’ve learned a bit about screenwriting.

(And don’t worry, Nick, et al—we know you don’t really like to spit on the writers, but if you don’t at least pretend to have bigger balls than the people giving you your movies and shows, you won’t be able to justify your bloated multi-million dollar salaries to shareholders keeping you in power. We understand. It’s a game. But you’re gonna lose.)

However, Nick, like all screenwriters—even Oscar nominess—you need to learn to deal with notes. So here are some thoughts on how to punch-up this little drama you’re writing…

NOTE #1: IT’S PREDICTABLE. I know you think your eleventh hour sucker-punch was a soul-crushing ambush, but it might’ve been more soul-crushing and more ambush-y if it hadn’t been predicted verbatim by everyone from Nikki Finke to John Aboud to Tom Schulman.

THE FIX:  Why not discuss, revamp, and come back with a reasonable proposal? No one will see that coming, and you won’t have blown your wad by giving away what’s coming. As we all know—sloppy plotting only reflects poorly on the writer (in this case, you guys).

NOTE #2: THE VILLAIN NEEDS TO BE SMARTER.  The story’s villain should always be smarter than the hero, or it never feels like the hero is fighting a formidable foe. Sure, this villain is a collective of multi-billion dollar studios with the ability to crush careers. But we’ve all spent the last eight years watching this exact same drama play out in the music industry… and the music industry lost. Big-time. So it’s hard to believe the AMPTP, with its “titans of business” like Bob Iger and Jeff Zucker, is all that smart or powerful when it insists on following in the footsteps of a business destroyed by its own hubris and short-sightedness. I mean, surely Bob Wright and Pat Weaver would never suggest using a strategy that just decimated an entire industry. But apparently, most of the guys on the AMPTP haven’t read the news since 1996. Or heard of iTunes. Or Radiohead. They’re still shopping for CD’s and wondering why they get disconnected signals whenever they call their music divisions.

THE FIX:  If the AMPTP isn’t smart enough to avoid the mistakes of its predecessors, at least give us a beat where they explain how this is different from the music industry. Because right now, they look like a bunch of old white guys who think the internet’s a fad.

NOTE #3: TAKE YOUR OWN ADVICE AND LISTEN TO THE FOCUS GROUPS. For years, Hollywood network and studio heads have based pilot-pickups and movie cuts on the opinions of focus groups composed of the general public. But the general public has announced, loudly and clearly, that they’re on the side of the writers. Not only are most of Americans against the AMPTP, but the AMPTP can’t even articulate what it is they’re holding out for. In other words, Nick—the villain’s motivation is unclear and audiences are responding negatively.

THE FIX: A hundred million Elvis fans can’t be wrong… and neither are two-thirds of the country. But like George W. Bush—who, ironically, most of the studio heads have donated millions of dollars against—the AMPTP doesn’t think the public’s opinion matters. But guess what, Nick and friends?... The same people who are telling you to quit acting like schmucks are the same people who told you Viva Laughlin sucked.

In other words: quit acting like schmucks—you’re not fooling anyone.

Anyway, while Nick Counter may have concocted the best second act break of the year, he seems to have forgotten one important fact...

The second-act break ain't the end of the movie.

And neither is this.

Like all second-act breaks, this one feels shitty when you’re in the middle of it. But like Elliott, Harry, and Ben… the heroes of this story will prevail.

Even if Nick Counter gets his Oscar.

incite_vs_insight_grammar_rules_robert_lee_brewer

Incite vs. Insight (Grammar Rules)

Learn when to use incite vs. insight with Grammar Rules from the Writer's Digest editors, including a few examples of correct usages.

Cleland_1:17

Jane K. Cleland: On Writing the Successful Long-Running Series

Award-winning mystery author Jane K. Cleland describes what it's like to write a long-running book series and offers expert advice for the genre writer.

writer's digest wd presents

WD Presents: #StartWrite, Virtual Conference, and New Courses

This week, we’re excited to announce free resources to start your writing year off well, our Novel Writing Virtual Conference, and more!

20_most_popular_writing_posts_of_2020_robert_lee_brewer

20 Most Popular Writing Posts of 2020

We share a lot of writing-related posts throughout the year on the Writer's Digest website. In this post, we've collected the 20 most popular writing posts of 2020.

Malden_1:16

Carla Malden: Writing With Optimism and Innocence

Screenwriter and author Carla Malden explains why young adult fiction and the '60s go hand-in-hand and how she connected with her main character's voice.

writing_mistakes_writers_make_talking_about_the_work_in_progress_robert_lee_brewer

Writing Mistakes Writers Make: Talking About the Work-in-Progress

The Writer's Digest team has witnessed many writing mistakes over the years, so we started this series to help identify them for other writers (along with correction strategies). This week's writing mistake writers make is talking about the work-in-progress.

Kelly_1:15

Greta K. Kelly: Publishing Is a Marathon

Debut author Greta K. Kelly reveals how the idea for her novel sparked and the biggest surprise of her publication journey.

Poetic Forms

Mistress Bradstreet Stanza: Poetic Forms

Poetic Form Fridays are made to share various poetic forms. This week, we look at the Mistress Bradstreet stanza, an invented form of John Berryman.

capital_vs_capitol_grammar_rules_robert_lee_brewer

Capital vs. Capitol (Grammar Rules)

Learn when to use capital vs. capitol with Grammar Rules from the Writer's Digest editors, including a few examples of correct usages.