How To Undermine the Strike AND Look Like an Idiot

Publish date:

For those of you monitoring the strike, there's clearly no shortage of reportage or opinions. From Nikki Finke to Variety to various petitions making their rounds through cyberspace, everyone's touched in some way and has something to say. And, for the most part, it's a fascinating whirlwind of perspectives and commentary. But there are some emails, which you may have gotten, that-- frankly-- are drivin' me nuts (and bear with me here, because I'm about to get angry)...

You may have gotten some of these emails, but in the past few days, I've received numerous chain-emails from people (usually assistants at networks, studios, and actual TV shows, the first places to get hit with job cuts) advocating things like, "It no longer matters what the issues are-- innocent people are losing their jobs-- so please, writers and producers, just get back in the room and start negotiating." One letter is even attempting to gather names of all writers, executives, and crew members who have lost jobs so it can send a letter containing their names to both the studios and the WGA in hopes of "shaming" them into negotiating. The letter claims it's not interested in taking sides or discussing issues-- it just wants both sides to swallow their pride and get back to the table. (This particular letter has now actually started its own blog, GetBackInThatRoom, which actually begins with these words as its second sentence... "Who is at fault doesn't matter.")

Well, to all the people starting these letters and the GetBackInThatRoom blog, I have only this to say: THESE ARE THE MOST COWARDLY, INEFFECTUAL ATTEMPTS TO JOIN THE FRAY I'VE EVER SEEN. (Not to mention... they make you, the letter-writers, look like uninformed, petulant adolescents.)

First of all... these letters ignorantly assume that both sides are being equally stubborn and
refusing to go back to the negotiating table, which isn’t true. The
writers would love to go back to the negotiating table, but it’s the
studios that are refusing. So these letters are not only misinformed, they insult the very
people who are doing their best to end the strike: the writers,
the people who are on the frontlines trying to protect the assistants and everyone else losing their jobs.

Secondly... both the WGA and the studios/networks know hundreds of people are losing jobs. Showing them a list of names ain't really a newsflash. In fact, both sides use that info to fuel their fire against the other side. In other words, handing the studios a list of unemployed people doesn’t shame them— it allows them to say, “Yup, it's tragic— and totally the writers’ fault. There’s nothing we can do, but thanks for proving our point. We’d love to help... yet our hands our tied.” And same for the writers.

Thirdly, and this point doesn’t anger me as much as it just... what's the word?... oh, yeah-- "amuses" me (like patting the letter-writers on the head and saying, "aw, you're so cute"): If the studios could be shamed into doing something, they would have been shamed long ago. These are multi-billion dollar corporations we’re talking about. They don’t feel “shame” until something affects their bottom line. Between 1980 and 2000, NBC's parent company, G.E., laid off over 100,000 American employees... and that was while the company's stock was rising.  So the notion that a list of a few hundred-- or even a few thousand-- unemployed people is going to “shame” anyone is naive and ineffectual at best... and embarrassingly ignorant at worst. It’s like watching a Chihuahua try to tackle an entire pack of German shepherds by barking at them... sad and cute, all at the same time. (This isn't to say I don't feel immense sympathy for anyone losing their job... I'm just saying that if you wanna make a point about the strike, say something that doesn't make you look like you've never read a newspaper or lived in the modern world for the last thirty years.)

Lastly (and this may be the part that angers me the most), is these letters' sheer cowardice in their refusal to take a stand. There is a right side and a wrong side in this strike, and virtually everyone-- probably with the exception of Nick Counter-- knows that. To dismiss that— to treat both sides the same, as if they’re both equals and just need to come to terms, without caring about the negotiating points— is not only offensive to the people who are trying to fight for something noble— including these letter-writers' jobs-- but it’s like sending out a beacon saying, “Hey, everyone— I don’t really understand, or care to understand, the truth of the situation. I just want to sound like I have something important to say!”

If you’re going to take a stand, letter-writers... TAKE A F*CKING STAND. Otherwise, get out of the way and stop looking like children. You're not helping anyone, including yourselves... and you're certainly not helping the writers who are giving up their livelihoods to protect yours.

(And by the way, if you do think neither side is right or
wrong-- that this is somehow a fair fight in which both sides just need
to find some middle ground, I'd challenge you to-- at the very least-- say that in your letter... and back it up.)

Again, none of this is to say I don't feel for people who have lost their jobs-- especially assistants, those at the bottom of the food chain who are innocent victims.

But if you're going to make a statement, do it with some intelligence and cajones. Send a letter to the conglomerates. Send the strikers some food. Join the picket. Sign this petition to the AMPTP.

We all feel the effects of this strike, and we’re all gonna feel it for weeks or months to come, and letters like these do nothing but throw wood on the fire and then run away without really saying anything. And that doesn't help anyone... especially the people who wrote them.

Poetry Prompt

Wednesday Poetry Prompts: 564

Every Wednesday, Robert Lee Brewer shares a prompt and an example poem to get things started on the Poetic Asides blog. This week, write a disappointment poem.

How to Approach Friends and Family About Your Memoir

How to Approach Friends and Family About Your Memoir

No one can decide whether showing your memoir to loved ones before it goes to press is the right choice for you. However, if you're planning to approach your friends and family about it, let memoirist Ronit Plank give you 3 tips for doing so.

Emily Henry: On Writing the Second Book

Emily Henry: On Writing the Second Book

Romance author Emily Henry describes the ups and downs of writing your second book, using her experiences writing her latest release, People We Meet on Vacation.

The Plot, by Jean Hanff Korelitz

Who Really Owns a Story?

Jean Hanff Korelitz, author of The Plot, on artistic appropriation and adaptations.

Abate vs. Bait vs. Bate (Grammar Rules)

Abate vs. Bait vs. Bate (Grammar Rules)

Learn the differences of abate, bait, and bate on with Grammar Rules from the Writer's Digest editors, including a few examples of correct usages.

Sarah Pinsker: On Reviving the Set-Aside Story

Sarah Pinsker: On Reviving the Set-Aside Story

Award-winning novelist Sarah Pinsker discusses how she picked up and put down a story over many years which would eventually become her latest release, We Are Satellites.

Mary Alice Monroe: On Writing the Family Saga

Mary Alice Monroe: On Writing the Family Saga

Award-winning author Mary Alice Monroe discusses what it's like to draft a series that spans generations and storylines.

writer's digest wd presents

WD Presents: Final Competition Deadline, Short Story Virtual Conference, and more!

This week, we’re excited to announce the Self-Published Book Awards deadline for 2021, details on the upcoming Short Story Virtual Conference, and more!