Skip to main content

TALKING POINTS: Does Marketing Affect the Quality of a Film?

Hey, guys--

So, I wanted to do something a bit different today... which is basically just: pick your brains and chat about stuff.

A couple weeks ago, I posted my "review" on Vantage Point... or at least, some thoughts on the writing of the movie. One of my biggest gripes is that the movie, like all mysteries, inherently asks the audience to go along for the ride and have the fun of trying to solve the riddle. This is the point of mysteries. And Vantage Point's marketing campaign supports this with the straightforward (although no less ridiculous) tagline: "Can you solve the puzzle?" The problem is: no, you can't solve the mystery, because the movie intentionally cheats you out of the clues necessary to do so. Which, I think, breaks the unspoken covenant between mystery storyteller and mystery audience.

Anyway, several of you wrote in, both in the blog's comments section and via email, with some interesting thoughts of your own, and one in particular caught my eye. Loyal reader Jake writes:

"Isn't it possible that the bigger problem is the marketing machine at
whatever studio put this out? Isn't it at all possible that they made
the film they wanted to make, and then the marketing machine said: hey,
let's make it a puzzle in need of solving?"

Well, before I get to the larger, more interesting question in Jake's post... lemme throw in my two cents worth for Jake.

In answer to: "Isn't it possible that they made
the film they wanted to make, then the marketing machine said: let's make it a puzzle in need of solving?"...

No. It's not possible. Or rather, if it is possible, then I'm even more dismayed by the filmmakers. Because regardless of its marketing, Vantage Pointdoesnotwork. It is fatally flawed as both a mystery and a story, so if it is the movie the producers set out to make, then... well... the producers have even more egg on their face, because they set out to make a crappy movie.

In fact, I think Vantage Point's marketing was the best thing about the film. It had great marketing! The trailers were cool... they clearly articulated the gimmick and the story of the movie... they made me want to see it! I actually think the marketing campaign was marketing the movie the producers had hoped to make... they just didn't pull it off.

Now, Jake also writes-- "At least the film was different. Give it some credit for that." And I agree. I appreciate what the film was trying to do... but that doesn't mean it didn't fail miserably. Which is also why I don't think the filmmakers "made the film they wanted to make." They had a vision, sure, but their final product fell far short. And that's not the fault of bad marketing.

However... the more interesting question buried in Jake's comments are: "How does movie marketing affect our enjoyment of a movie?"

In other words, if a movie's marketing campaign leads us to believe one thing, and it leads our expectations in a certain direction, but then the movie turns out to be something different... even if it's a good movie... how do we react? Do we hate the movie? Are we surprised but pleased?

I'm just thinking out loud... and I'm trying to think of examples where the trailers and marketing campaign made the movie look like one thing, and it was actually entirely different. And when a movie is mis-marketed, does it affect how much you like the movie? Can good storytelling and acting still shine through and trump an audience's misled expectations?

I dunno... I'm wondering...

From Script

Vulnerability as an Asset (From Script)

In this week’s round up brought to us by Script magazine, exclusive interviews with Netflix’s acclaimed mini-series “Keep Breathing” creators Martin Gero and Brendan Gall, and BounceTV’s “Johnson” creator and star Deji LaRay.

Michael J. Seidlinger: On Asking Questions in Horror

Michael J. Seidlinger: On Asking Questions in Horror

Author Michael J. Seidlinger discusses the writing process of his new literary horror novel, Anybody Home?

10 Tips for Building a Realistic and Vibrant Fictional World

10 Tips for Building a Realistic and Vibrant Fictional World

World-building of any kind can seem like a daunting task. Here, author Nalini Singh shares 10 tips for building a realistic and vibrant fictional world.

Adalyn Grace: On Writing for Escape

Adalyn Grace: On Writing for Escape

New York Times bestselling author Adalyn Grace discusses combining her favorite genres into her new YA fantasy novel, Belladonna.

writer's digest wd presents

WD Presents: Our September/October Cover Reveal, a Competition Deadline Reminder, and More!

This week, we're excited to announce our September/October 2022 cover, a competition deadline reminder, and more!

Writing Nonfiction History vs. Historical Fiction

Writing Nonfiction History vs. Historical Fiction

Author John Cameron discusses how nonfiction history and historical fiction are more similar than they are different.

Bob Eckstein | Publishing Survival Tips

Top 10+ Survival Tips for Publishing

Poignant advice from some of the funniest people in publishing.

Zac Bissonnette: On the Passionate Community of Mystery Lovers

Zac Bissonnette: On the Passionate Community of Mystery Lovers

New York Times bestselling author Zac Bissonnette discusses the process of writing his new cozy mystery, A Killing in Costumes.

My Long, Winding, and Very Crooked Writing Journey

My Long, Winding, and Very Crooked Writing Journey

Every writer’s publishing story is different. Here, author Sharon M. Peterson shares her journey from writing to publishing.