The Much Maligned Adverb

Publish date:
Image placeholder title

Today's guest post is by Jim Adam, who wrote a wonderful 3-part series on protagonists & goals. Read the part 3 here (which includes links to parts 1 & 2). Visit Jim at his site or follow him on Twitter.

Garcia Marquez, Nobel Laureate, went on record several years ago saying
that he no longer uses adverbs. If he encounters one in his writing,
he removes it. And he's not alone. A lot of writers, editors, agents,
publishers, and academics these days seem to have joined the crowd,
insisting that adverbs should be avoided altogether.

Do some of
these folks remove adverbs from their dialogue too? Not from dialogue
tags, but from the dialogue itself? I'm guessing some of them do. Oops!

adverbs can be overused. But if one extreme is bad, the opposite
extreme is just as bad. Balance in all things. Extremism comes in
many forms, and it flows just as easily from a word processor as from
an Uzi submachine gun.

Doing something the same way every time
doesn't require a great artist. It doesn't require a brain. It
doesn't even require something as sophisticated as a computer. A
mechanism of gears and springs, a clockwork automaton, a machine in the
1800s sense of the word: that's all it takes to do something the same
way every time.

Consider the title of this article. I could
easily have entitled this piece, "The Maligned Adverb," and the result
would have been little different. However, "The Much Maligned Adverb"
works. There is nothing inherently offensive or distracting about it. And the point of this article isn't that adverbs have been criticized,
because some of the criticism is warranted. Rather, the point is that
adverbs have been overly criticized.

A title like "The Overly
Maligned Adverb" would be weaker, in my way of thinking, because it
loses the alliteration of "much maligned." In any case, calling this
article "The Adverb" (avoiding any sort of modifier at all), "The
Maligned Adverb," "The Much Maligned Adverb," or "The Overly Maligned
Adverb," should be a result of the writer actively deciding which title
suits them and their subject the best, not the result of a mindless
bigotry toward modifiers in general, and adverbs in particular.

can, in fact, make for more compact writing. Consider:

"With a
reluctant grin" vs. "Grinning reluctantly"

In the Strunk and
White sense, the adverbial version is tighter and, therefore, better. It uses two words compared to the adjectival version's four, a saving
of 50%.

Naturally, a fanatic would claim that the previous
example is meaningless since both reluctant and reluctantly should be

But consider a sentence slipped in earlier: "It flows just as
easily from a word processor as from an Uzi." Would a Nobel Prize
winner spend time rewriting that sentence so as to eliminate the need
for "easily"? Apparently he would. Feel free to give it a go
yourself. Personally, I find such endeavors to be not only pointless,
but downright silly.

Adverbs are like the writer's version of vibrato. Once upon a time, a guest conductor at a philharmonic
orchestra asked the lead violin player for a tuning tone, got back a
note with vibrato on it, and had to be carted out of the practice hall
in a straitjacket. Even then, I'm not sure the violin player
understood her mistake. Most likely, she wasn't even consciously aware
of using vibrato.

When overused, any technique becomes a tick, a
mannerism. It ceases to be a skill wielded artistically, like adding
icing to a cake, and instead becomes a cake buried in a blob of icing.
This is true of vibrato in music as well as Tom Swifties and other
adverbial abuses in writing. But this doesn't mean that either vibrato
or adverbs should be discarded altogether.

In religion, people
do pointless, silly things and then claim that makes them more moral. In writing, people do pointless, silly things and claim they're better
writers for it:

  • Don't end a sentence in a preposition.
  • Don't split your infinitives.
  • Don't use adverbs.

are the sorts of rules that people embrace not because the rules make
sense, but because the rules are absolute. Absolutist rules eliminate
that insecurity we feel when we rely on our conscience (in the realm of
morality) or our discernment (in the realm of art). Though absolute
rules sometimes cause us to behave like we have obsessive-compulsive
disorder (or worse), we continue to embrace them, and the world is a
less happy place because of it.

Sure, writers need to keep an
eye on their adjectives and adverbs, to not let them get out of hand. Overuse of modifiers is every bit as bad as cutting modifiers out
altogether. And vice versa. The sweet spot is somewhere between those
two extremes, and where you find your personal sweet spot helps
distinguish you as a unique writer.

Let all right-thinking
people take a stand now against fanaticism of all kinds, including the
current bigotry toward the humble adverb.

John B. Thompson | Book Wars

John B. Thompson: On Researching Changes in the Book Publishing Industry

John B. Thompson, author of the new book Book Wars, shares the research that went into his account of how the digital revolution changed publishing for readers and writers.

From Script

Supporting AAPI Storytellers and Tapping into Mythical World Building (From Script)

In this week’s round-up from, meet South-East-Asian-American filmmakers and screenwriters, plus interviews with screenwriter Emma Needell and comic book writer/artist Matt Kindt, TV medical advisor Dr. Oren Gottfried, and more!

What Is a Personal Essay in Writing?

What Is a Personal Essay in Writing?

In this post, we look at what a personal essay (also known as the narrative essay) is, including what makes it different from other types of fiction and nonfiction writing, examples of effective personal essays, and more.

FightWrite™: How Do People Who Don’t Know How to Fight, Fight?

FightWrite™: How Do People Who Don’t Know How to Fight, Fight?

If your character isn't a trained fighter but the scene calls for a fight, how can you make the scene realistic? Author and trained fighter Carla Hoch has the answers for writers here.

April PAD Challenge

30 Poetry Prompts for the 2021 April PAD Challenge

Find all 30 poetry prompts for the 2021 April Poem-A-Day Challenge in this post.

The Problem of Solving a Mystery When You're the Prime Suspect

The Problem of Solving a Mystery When You're the Prime Suspect

Mia P. Manansala, author of Arsenic & Adobo, explains how writers can help their main character solve a mystery when they're the prime suspect.

Mistakes Writers Make: Not Using Your Spare 15 Minutes

Mistakes Writers Make: Not Using Your Spare 15 Minutes

The Writer's Digest team has witnessed many writing mistakes over the years, so we started this series to help identify them for other writers (along with correction strategies). This week's writing mistake writers make is not using your spare 15 minutes.

Plot Twist Story Prompts: Unexpected Visitor

Plot Twist Story Prompts: Unexpected Visitor

Every good story needs a nice (or not so nice) turn or two to keep it interesting. This week, invite an unexpected visitor into your story.

7 Tips for Writing a Near Future Dystopian Novel

7 Tips for Writing a Near-Future Dystopian Novel

In this article, debut author Christina Sweeney-Baird explains how writers can expertly craft a near-future dystopian novel.