Capitalization

What's going on in your writing world? Connect with the writing community here and talk about whatever's on your mind.
jackitaylor
Private First Class
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:24 am

Capitalization

Postby jackitaylor » Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:05 am

A specific scenario here. I feel a bit stupid for asking this, just confirming I am doing it right . . .

If I am referring to a playing card, the ace of spades, in a general way, I wouldn't capitalize that - "I saw an ace of spades", but if I'm referring to a specific one, as in, the only one, the one in my hand or the only one in a singe deck, I would then capitalize it? "The Ace of Spades fell to the floor" or "The Ace of Spades was torn" That is how I'm doing it now. Is that correct?

rob-lost
Corporal
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue May 23, 2017 11:22 am
Location: IL, USA

Re: Capitalization

Postby rob-lost » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:06 am

GOOD question!

I think not, and Wikipedia agrees with me:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Poker/Guidelines#Card_names_and_suits

==Card names and suits should not be treated as proper nouns (i.e. should not be capitalized), whether used in isolation or in combination to describe a single card. For example:

"the ace of spades" not "the Ace of Spades"==

I don't consider Wikipedia to be authoritative, so maybe it's worth looking up other sources. But this makes sense to me.
Write for the love of writing? Try my Writers Writing forum
http://writerswriting.proboards.com

jackitaylor
Private First Class
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:24 am

Re: Capitalization

Postby jackitaylor » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:28 am

yeah, I don't usually bank on wikipedia. I would at least find another source, just to be positive. Quite a few years ago, in college composition, we weren't allowed to cite wikipedia as a source, it wasn't considered credible. That doesn't mean it's wrong of course. You are most likely correct, but i will check around online about it. thanks!

User avatar
ostarella
Lieutenant
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:51 am

Re: Capitalization

Postby ostarella » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:38 am

It wouldn't be capitalized just because it's "special" or unique. It's not a proper noun, ie, a name - it's just a thing.

Here's a good overall reference:

http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp

jackitaylor
Private First Class
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:24 am

Re: Capitalization

Postby jackitaylor » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:40 pm

thanks ostarella. I swear I've seen it capitalized though somewhere, thats probably how the idea got in my head . . .

rob-lost
Corporal
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue May 23, 2017 11:22 am
Location: IL, USA

Re: Capitalization

Postby rob-lost » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:00 pm

[quote="jackitaylor"]thanks ostarella. I swear I've seen it capitalized though somewhere, thats probably how the idea got in my head . . .[/quote]
FYI, I doubt that this would kill a submission. Good to ask, and to follow, but the publisher will tell you how they will handle it.
Write for the love of writing? Try my Writers Writing forum
http://writerswriting.proboards.com

jackitaylor
Private First Class
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:24 am

Re: Capitalization

Postby jackitaylor » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:27 pm

That's good to know, rob-lost! Thanks.

User avatar
DrG2
Colonel
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:13 pm

Re: Capitalization

Postby DrG2 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:04 pm

{quote="jackitaylor"}Quite a few years ago, in college composition, we weren't allowed to cite wikipedia as a source, it wasn't considered credible. {/quote}
Sigh. The reason wikipedia is not a great choice as a reference is that it can change from day to day, not because it isn't credible. It's credible for most topics.

User avatar
robjvargas
Captain
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:59 pm
Location: IL, USA

Re: Capitalization

Postby robjvargas » Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:31 pm

credible: able to be believed; convincing.

As far as I'm concerned, that editability is the reason it's not credible.

I use it as the first step in research quite a lot. Like with my initial reply here. But in and of itself, Wikipedia doesn't have the controls in place to be either credible or authoritative.
Slowly putting together a "replacement" forum at http://writerswriting.proboards.com.

It's still under construction, but come take a look.

jackitaylor
Private First Class
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:24 am

Re: Capitalization

Postby jackitaylor » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:41 am

I do that too, rob, wikipedia and then try to find some other confirmation, from another, better source.

Next

Return to Writers' Block Party

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests