Required Introduction

Stop in and get to know your fellow writers.

Moderator: ostarella

MPhillip
Private E-1
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:48 am

Required Introduction

Postby MPhillip » Thu Sep 14, 2017 7:07 am

.
Last edited by MPhillip on Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

plughmann
Sergeant
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: Required Introduction

Postby plughmann » Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:45 am

[quote="MPhillip"]I am, therefore I think. Apologies to M. Descartes.

This is my official request for posting privileges.[/quote]

========

Yes. He got it backwards. Should have said I think, therefore I think I am.

plughmann
Sergeant
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: Required Introduction

Postby plughmann » Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:30 pm

[quote="Ecojoe"]"I am" establishes one's existence which is a pre-requisite for being able to think. If one doesn't exist, one can not possibly think. Therefore, I believe, the correct sentence is " I am, therefore, I think".[/quote]

"I am " establishes nothing ; and assumes something that is unproven, which is a logical fallacy. My version is more accurate.

MPhillip
Private E-1
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:48 am

Re: Required Introduction

Postby MPhillip » Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:58 am

.


Return to Introductions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DarylPoina, JessieSlork and 4 guests

cron